Santa Cruz Slugs

Posts Tagged ‘shani chabansky’

The Jewish Dark Continent: A Revival of Jewish Culture

In Judaism and Society, Reviews, Spring 2012 on July 18, 2012 at 8:30 pm

By Shani Chabansky

If you’ve ever considered Jewishness a part of your identity, you’ve probably faced the question, “what is Jewish?” For centuries, this question simply was not asked. Jewishness took place in the domestic realm, transferred from parents to children through mimetic pedagogy. A mother would teach her daughters to bake challah and a father would teach his sons to read Torah. But in the modern era, the time spent in the home has become increasingly shortened, as the period between childhood and marriage has grown. So, as family becomes less and less central to the life cycle, where does Jewishness happen?

One place where Jewishness flourishes is in literature. Historically, the phrase “people of the book” refers to the Jewish relationship with religious texts. Yet words have also held a special place in less traditional forms of Jewish writing; recently the number of Jewish novels, magazines, and newspapers has skyrocketed. For instance, just before Passover, the Jewish media (and even The Colbert Report) gushed over The New American Haggadah, an artsy version of the user’s guide for the Passover seder. Edited by Jonathan Safran Foer, the author of the much-loved Everything is Illuminated, and re-translated by Nathan Englander, this version of the Haggadah is laced with commentaries from the cherished authors Rebecca Goldstein, Jeffery Goldberg, Daniel Handler (also known as Lemony Snickett), and the co-director of UC Santa Cruz’s own Jewish Studies Program, Professor Nathaniel Deutsch.

It turns out that Deutsch is a major player in what seems to be a nation-wide project to revitalize Jewish culture through literature. In his recently published book, The Jewish Dark Continent: Life and Death in the Russian Pale of Settlement, Deutsch dusts off the pages of The Jewish Ethnographic Program, a survey of the rituals and traditions of the Pale of Settlement. Renowned historian Simon Dubnow called this territory of land, the only place the Russian Empire permitted Jews to live, a Jewish “Dark Continent,” inspiring the title of Deutsch’s book. The survey was part of a larger project called “The Jewish Ethnographic Expedition” and was led by An-sky, a Jewish-Russian revolutionary who was born in the Pale, but lived the majority of his life illegally in St. Petersburg. Afraid of Jewish culture being wiped out as a result of the dramatic rise in anti-Semitism and assimilation during the turn of the twentieth century, An-sky conducted his expedition in order to document the cultural patterns of the shtetls (Jewish villages) before they were destroyed. The Jewish Dark Continent is the impressive product of Deutsch’s eight-year multidisciplinary enterprise to offer the first English translation of An-sky’s survey from its original Yiddish version.

Partly as a result of heightened anti-Semitism, but also in response to the elite status of Jewish intellectualism, An-sky’s goal was to make Judaism accessible to all Jews, regardless of social status or class. In order to facilitate this process, he had to draw upon traditional Jewish scholarship and simultaneously push against it, redefining Torah so that it would include the folk culture of the shtetl. In the introduction of his survey, An-sky argues that songs, dances, rituals, jokes, and myths should form the basis of the Torah Sheba’al Peh (Oral Torah), and what was formerly part of the Torah Sheba’al Peh, the Talmud, Midrash, and Mishnah, should be placed into the category of the Torah Shebichtav (Written Torah), along with the Tanakh. This new Oral Torah would “…[reflect] the same beauty and purity of the Jewish soul, the tenderness and nobility of the Jewish heart, and the height and depth of Jewish thought.”[1] By elevating folk culture to the status of Torah, An-sky both broke from and continued religious Jewish scholarship. While he remained consistent with categorizing something as Torah in order to legitimize it in the eyes of rabbis and Jewish religious scholars, he also made a radical move by redefining Torah itself. In doing so, he brought Jewishness to the common Jew, so that no matter what his or her background—tailor or rabbi, matchmaker or rebbetzin—they too could, as Deutsch says, “become amateur ethnographers, or zamelers (literally, ‘collectors’).”[2]

The Jewish Dark Continent is a metaphorical resurrection of An-sky’s project. Deutsch’s annotations in the survey read like a conversation with An-sky. Just as An-sky hoped that his ethnographic work would inspire common Jews to become ethnographers of Jewish culture themselves, so too does Deutsch extend “… an invitation to those interested in doing their own research, whether by asking the questions of someone they know or by examining the many books, articles, and Internet resources that are available.”[3] As an atheist, An-sky’s project to revitalize Jewish culture was an attempt to divorce culture from religion, opening up culture to individuals who don’t identify as religious, but wish to remain connected to Jewishness. Using An-sky’s ethnographic study as a launching-pad, Deutsch calls upon today’s Jews to take a deep look at their cultural roots.

In many ways, the anxieties of today’s Jewish communities echo the anxieties felt by the Jewish communities in the Pale. Today, just as then, Jews face assimilation. Thus, the question what is Jewish becomes an especially heated debate. Ultimately, Judaism is based on practice, the activities that fill up the hours in a day. During the destruction of the Russian Empire, anti-Semitism directly threatened the Jewish community, so that the daily activities documented in An-sky’s survey became a danger to Jewish existence. An-sky’s project to revitalize Jewish culture was a way of legitimizing, and thereby safeguarding, the Jewish people. Similarly, now in the United States it is difficult to integrate Jewishness into a daily routine without turning to religion or Zionism; the amount of synagogues and Israel advocacy groups far outweigh the number of non-religious or non-Zionist Jewish organizations. Yet now more than ever, Jewish communities have the luxury of being able to practice Jewishness without risking persecution. The Jewish Dark Continent serves as a reminder that Jewishness has a rich and vibrant history, one that can serve as a basis for rethinking our current experiences. Unlike the Jews of the Pale, Jewish communities now have the opportunity to explore our cultural ancestry, to wrestle with its contemporary significance, and meditate on what makes us Jewish.

1. Nathaniel Deutch, The Jewish Dark Continent: Life and Death in the Russian Pale of Settlement, (Cambrige: Harvard University Press, 2011), 103.

2. Deutch, Jewish Dark Continent, 35.

3. Deutch, Jewish Dark Continent, 101.

Published on page 49 of the Spring 2012 issue of Leviathan.

Share

Why This Night is Different

In Literature, Personal Interest, Spring 2012 on July 18, 2012 at 2:36 am

By Shani Chabansky

The congestion got to her consciousness first. Then came the afternoon sun, staring at her through the slats of the venetian blinds she’d forgotten to shut before her afternoon nap. When she reached for the clock on her nightstand, she felt the sweat that had seeped through her clothes and onto her bed sheets. 5:00 p.m. Sophie Reznik still couldn’t breathe through her nose, but the lack of tension in her neck and shoulders and the ease with which she could move her limbs told her that the fever had broken.

“Soph, are you awake? I need your help in the kitchen!” Her mother had been bustling about all week long, preparing for the seder. Watching her multitask was like watching a professional circus clown, juggling her zillions of post-it notes and to-do lists.

“Yeah, I’ll be there in a minute!”

Wading through the mountain of used Kleenex, damp pajamas, and piles of half-highlighted social theory articles ripped unceremoniously from school readers, she tossed on a pair of jeans and a t-shirt and shuffled into the kitchen.

The pre-Pesach preparations dance began. There is no professional choreographer in the world who could match the elegance of a mother and daughter symbiotically concocting a meal. It was pure telepathy, the way they skirted around each other like Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers.

In many ways it was sure to be a typical seder, nothing special. It would be just as anxiety-inducing and potentially explosive as the years before. The subjects of tonight’s arguments would be the only variable to set this seder apart. It was her stepfather’s first Passover experience, as her grandmother would be sure to mention. Although she claimed that she’d made peace with her daughter’s newly acquired Italian husband, Bubbe’s subtle little comments about the “unconventional” relationship gave her true feelings away. And then there’d be her father, who was quite the character himself—an Israeli, obsessed with the high-tech industry in Silicon Valley. He was sure to bring his latest toy, this time a tiny digital video camera to record the evening and share with the chevrei in Ramat Gan. And then there’d be Rosa, Sophie’s first girlfriend.

The doorbell interrupted their trance-like preparations.

“Hello?” A septum-pierced nose followed by a pair of brown eyes peered around the door.

“Hey!” Sophie said. “Mom, I’d like you to meet Rosa.”

When she came out to her parents back in high school, she didn’t have any proof to support her claim that she was a lesbian. As much as she enjoyed the bi-curiosity of the girls in the drama department, an actual lesbian relationship seemed as impossible as acceptance into a Haredi community. But during her first quarter at UC Berkeley, she enrolled in FMST 1: Introduction to Feminist Studies, and that’s where she met Rosa. When she informed her parents that she would be accompanied by her first girlfriend at the seder, they supported her (albeit with raised eyebrows and tones tinged with skepticism).

More than anyone, it was Bubbe’s reaction to Rosa that Sophie was concerned about. Radical in all senses of the word, Bubbe was the kind of grandma your friends envy, while you’re stuck coping. Sure, her noodle kugel made Sophie’s house the high school hang-out spot and, once in a while, the old jewelry she gave Sophie for birthday presents would come back into fashion. But somehow, dinner conversations with Bubbe always involved a half-hearted attempt to avoid anything remotely controversial, the inevitable slip, and then the plunge into the political whirlpool (no snorkels involved).

She could just imagine the dinner conversation unfolding. Her father would inevitably tell the story of when his mother bought a live carp and kept it in their bathtub for a few days before the seder. He and his sister grew attached to the fish, then were forced to witness the death of their pet when their mother turned the carp into gefilte. Bubbe would be white-knuckling her walker while Sophie and Rosa discussed the prison industrial complex. Having had enough, Bubbe would open up the floodgates, arguing that, in fact, slavery is a thing of the past and that, in fact, the United States is a post-racial society. What do undocumented workers in Los Angeles have anything to do with Moses and the burning bush?

“Let’s turn now to the first page and begin with the kadesh,” her mother announced.

Sophie grabbed Rosa’s hand underneath the table and gave it a reassuring squeeze. The first cup of wine, as always, went down silently. Sophie wondered why they always sang “Ma Nishtana” before they were sufficiently sloshed. By the time they’d downed the second cup, Sophie’s congestion came back with a vengeance and her patience for Bubbe’s wisecracks started waning.

“Well, I’d ask you when I can expect grandchildren, but now that you’re lesbian, things are different…”

“You want different?” Sophie exploded, blowing a wad of phlegm into her napkin and tossing back her second second cup. “I’ll give you different! How about the difference between an egalitarian, agrarian society and a colonialist, capitalist enterprise? You wanna talk differences? How about the differences between a progressive Judaism driven by social justice and a conservative Judaism blinded by faith?”

“Progressive Judaism? You’d be happier in a Marxist system where, as we all know, Jews are treated with the utmost respect,” Bubbe sarcastically spat. “I’m sorry to say, sweetie, that you should get a life and step outside your crazy leftist echo chamber.”

Banot…” her father interjected. “We haven’t even hidden the afikoman yet! Nu? What’s with the pause? Save the fireworks for the dinner. Yalla!”

“What’s the point of finding the afikoman? I know what’s coming. What’s the prize this year, a new freaking iPhone?” Sophie demanded. Rosa squeezed her hand under the table and Sophie sighed. “Okay, okay. What’s next? The Four Sons?”

“Let’s see, let’s skip ahead to the plagues,” her mother

finally spoke up. “Let’s start with dam, sephardaya, kinim…”

They managed to get through the first half of the seder without any further interruption. Well past midnight, Sophie toyed with the half-eaten macaroon on her plate. Between the wine and the fever that was claiming her mind, it was getting extremely difficult to recall the lyrics to “Chad Gadya.” Bubbe was nodding off into her Nescafe. She looked across the table and found her

mother’s gaze.

“Well, I guess it’s about that time, folks,” said her mother. “Don’t worry about the dishes, just leave everything where it is.”

Sophie walked around the table and touched Bubbe lightly on her shoulder. “Hey Bubbe, it’s time to get up. The seder’s over.”

“What’s that? Oh, thanks Soph. You’re a good girl,”

Bubbe said.

“Thanks, Bubbe.” Sophie helped her out of her chair, called a taxi, and waited with her in the living room.

“I think we forgot to let Elijah in,” Sophie murmured. The prophet’s absence was the least political thought she could muster up. She hoped Bubbe’s exhaustion would prevent another

argument.

“Serves him right,” Bubbe replied. “Seventy-five seders and not once have I seen the guy lift a finger around the house.”

Outside, the taxi honked. Sophie helped Bubbe into the car.

“Are you sure you don’t want to take home any haroset?”

“No, no. I’ll be fine. Thank you, sweetheart.”

Lyla tov, Bubbe.”

“Good night, Sophie.”

Published on page 11 of the Spring 2012 issue of Leviathan.

Share

Photo

In Multimedia, Winter 2012 Issue on May 19, 2012 at 5:04 am

Picture by Shani Chabansky

Published on page 17 of the Winter 2012 issue of Leviathan.

Share

Leviathan Staff – Spring 2011

In Spring 2011 Issue on May 21, 2011 at 12:53 am

This is a list Leviathan’s Winter 2011 staff.

Read the rest of this entry »

Share

Operation Jewish American Scoliosis: Federal Investigation of Anti-Semitism at UC Santa Cruz

In Campus, Essays, Judaism and Society, Spring 2011 Issue on May 21, 2011 at 12:04 am

Operation Jewish American Scoliosis:

Federal Investigation of Anti-Semitism at UC Santa Cruz 

Shani Chabansky

The Failure of the American Jewish Establishment

What happens when one person speaks for a large group of people? If everybody in the group feels the same way as the speaker, the statement is powerful. But things rarely play out so nicely, especially when people in the group feel misrepresented. Collective identity, with its ability to be so easily distorted, has been an issue on the tips of many kosher tongues for years. Why, in a nation boasting the power of free speech, do so many Jewish youth feel that their voices have been hushed in conversations about Israel? In an article published in the New York Times Book Review, Peter Beinart, professor of Journalism and Political Science at the City University of New York, directly addressed the widening gap between Jewish youth and Zionism. “For several decades,” he wrote, “the Jewish establishment has asked American Jews to check their liberalism at Zionism’s door, and now, to their horror, they are finding that many young Jews have checked their Zionism instead.”[1] Beinart’s article “The Failure of the American Jewish Establishment” rallied up the scattered troops who feel deep within their bones that in many circles it is, at the very least, a kick in the progressive kishkes to support the Jewish state.

 

Federal Investigation of Anti-Semitism at UC Santa Cruz

Amid the scholastic trench warfare that is finals week, crunch time last quarter was associated with something far more troubling: On March 15th, 2011, the Institute for Jewish and Community Research (IJCR) announced that the U.S. Department of Education Office for Civil Rights (OCR) opened an official investigation of anti-Semitism on whose university? Our university! The investigation responds to a formal complaint filed in June of 2009 by Hebrew lecturer Tammi Rossman-Benjamin.[2] The complaint reports a “harassing and intimidating

environment for Jewish students” as a result of “rhetoric which demonizes Israel, compares contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis, calls for the dismantling of the Jewish State . . . [and] crosses the line into anti-Semitism according to the standards employed by our own government.”[3] Rossman-Benjamin catalogues every activity of perceived anti-Semitism since 2001. Her twenty- nine page document highlights a variety of incidents, including a Community Studies course on violence and nonviolence, in which the instructor “[encouraged] students to engage in anti-Israel activism.” Our university’s failure to respond to this issue allegedly violates Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which “prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origins” in federally-funded events.[4] According to the complaint, our university has not upheld its part of the bargain. And we’re not the only affected campus. There is a similar investigation at UC Berkeley, but unlike the investigation here, Berkeley faces a federal lawsuit of anti- Semitism after a student was attacked “because she was holding a sign stating ‘Israel wants Peace.’”[5]

 

Responses to the Investigation

What you have before you is a personal investigation of an issue far deeper than the federal investigation itself. This is an attempt to shed light on what is already a nation-wide discussion, one in which the Jewish community in Santa Cruz must participate immediately. Most relevant to the conversation at hand are the students directly affected by the investigation, the voice of involved Jewish students, most of whom find the investigation unnecessary. A Jewish sophomore who was born in Israel and requested to remain anonymous, said, “Personally, I have never felt threatened because of my Jewish identity … The investigation to me sounds a little overdramatic.” Other Jewish students found frustration in the lack of accessible information detailing the mechanics of the investigation.

The plot thickens. Some feel the investigation is laying the groundwork for a postmodern Jewish armageddon right here on our very own campus. Shira Bogin, a Jewish junior with family in Israel, said, “It is completely offensive to me as a Jewish person to say that certain events and political backgrounds automatically make something anti-Semitic.” In an article published in an online news source, Rebecca Pierce, a Jewish and African-American junior who plans to visit Israel this summer, cites examples of harassment coming from within the Jewish community itself, as a result of her “choice to engage in [her] Jewish identity and speak out [on Israeli policy].”[6] Pierce and Bogin are just two of many students who feel threatened in the Jewish community for sharing a challenging opinion about Israel.

In fact, most young American Jews do not identify as Zionists.[7] Jewish journalist and Santa Cruz local Danny Wool suggests, “The problem is that [the complaint] is in itself anti- Semitic. One significant underlying feature of anti-Semitism is that it looks at the Jews as a homogeneous group.”[8] The semantics of the complaint suggest that all Jewish students at UC Santa Cruz feel that their Jewish identity is threatened by university-sponsored events which question the existence of Israel as a Jewish state. But Pierce and Bogin illustrate what Contemporary Jewry calls the “Distancing Hypothesis, the suggestion that American Jews increasingly are socially, culturally, ethnically, and emotionally distant from the State of Israel.”[9] As Israel Fellow of Santa Cruz Hillel, Erez Shachar, points out, “There is a large population of Jewish students (about 20%) on the campus and we cannot assume that there are not other experiences that need to be heard.”[10] The complaint refers to the students who feel threatened by the reported anti-Semitism not as “some Jewish students,” not as “the Jewish students,” but simply as “Jewish students.” The description of the victims is vague and does not accurately represent the feelings of all Jewish students at UC Santa Cruz.

 

Soap Box: Cultural Scoliosis and Critical Education Shpiel

         Beinart’s research detects a parting of the Jewish university sea, a ringing of the Jewish liberty bell; young Jews find themselves either as steadfast advocates of Israel or violators of Judaism for dropping their Zionist values. But it’s not that simple, other factors come into play; revealing a strong connection between those who define Judaism as a religion and those who support Israel as a Jewish state, Rossman-Benjamin said, “I really do believe that it is a religious issue. Even though not all Jews feel that way about Israel, but it is a religious belief. My love of Israel is based on being a Jew.” The matter is steeped with religious belief.

The investigation indicates a problem facing the Jewish American community. If some Jews feel their Jewish identity is threatened by anti-Zionism, but not all Jews are Zionist, then how can we recognize anti-Semitism? With so many varied definitions of Judaism itself, it is almost impossible to discern what constitutes bigotry against Jews. During our interview, Rossman-Benjamin addressed the ambiguous definition of anti-Semitism herself. “Anti- Semitism is somehow lost when you talk about racism and bigotry and hatred. I want there to be special language in university policy that addresses this particular issue and I want there to be some kind of a definition of what constitutes anti-Semitic behavior.” Title VI does not cover discrimination based on religion, but it does cover discrimination based on national origins. The Jewish students who feel their national origins are tied to Israel are covered in Title VI. But the ambiguous phrasing of the complaint suggest that all Jews feel their national origins are tied to Israel. As Pierce and Bogin demonstrate, this is clearly not the case.

It is crucial to understand why many students allegedly feel a “harassing and intimidating environment” when the university sponsors events which question the existence of Israel as a Jewish state. These students feel a different connection with Judaism than the students who do not feel threatened by such events. Speaking from the same place as the students represented in her complaint, Rossman-Benjamin said, “It’s just so wrong to use your Jewishness, like using your university affiliation, to do something that’s political. It’s using your Jewish affiliation to advance a political goal that’s not about Judaism or the Jewish people.” Arguably, Zionism is also a political goal, guided through religious values. For the students represented in the complaint, being Jewish means to believe that Israel should be a Jewish state.

It is not wrong for a Jew to steer political orientation away from religious Zionism. Pierce said, “I do not believe that speaking out about this makes me an anti-Semite, in fact I see it as an expression of Jewish values regarding social justice.” In fact, many suggest that a religious connection to Israel is an aging characteristic in the Jewish spectrum. Gary Rosenblatt, editor-in- chief of The Jewish Week, writes, “On the one side are young people, raised as liberals and humanitarians, who have grown up seeing Israel through the prism of intifadas, harsh and inconclusive wars in Lebanon and Gaza, and increasing international isolation. On the other side are their elders who recall the courageous, even miraculous, early successes of the Jewish State and who are not afraid to call themselves nationalists when it comes to Israel.”[11] Neglecting the childhood of today’s liberal youth, the complaint only takes into consideration the older generation’s nationalist vision of Israel.

The image of a spine is a powerful metaphor for the Jewish community. Simply put, scoliosis is a condition in which the vertebrae are misaligned, creating a curve in the spine. Although tension and discomfort are common symptoms, most cases of scoliosis do not require surgery; a more effective antidote would be to build the muscles surrounding the curved areas and to increase flexibility. The spine of the Jewish community does not require surgery. The Jews who criticize Israel in the name of Judaism itself deserve to be included in the definition of anti- Semitism’s victims. It would behoove Jewish training establishments to build Jewish education using what Rosenblatt calls “an open exploration of issues rather than the candy-coated version.”[12] A Bar or Bat Mitzvah could instigate long-term projects of social reform. The Birthright trip could get non-Jewish youth to Israel and carefully selected trips could explore the occupied territories of the West Bank. We, the Jews in Santa Cruz, are part of the Diaspora. And whether we like it or not, we have a role to play in the presentation of Israel. If we wish to strengthen the spine of our community, we must face the tension and discomfort of inconvenient curves and welcome each individual vertebrae.

Playing host to alternative culture, UC Santa Cruz is a magnet for students in search of a special kind of education. What Rossman- Benjamin calls “…a whole college that’s based around the notion of identity politics,” others consider a space in which open debate is not only tolerated, but welcomed. A growing interest in the new Jewish Studies major and the endless struggle for an Ethnic Studies program exemplify our student body’s willingness to participate in an exploration of social inequality. This is a championing feature of our university, and one about which to unabashedly boast over the seder table.

 

More information on the details of federal investigation of anti- Semitism at UC Santa Cruz will appear in the upcoming fall 2011 issue of Leviathan Jewish Journal.

 

Special thanks for editorial assistance from Matthew Borden, Amberly Young and Melinda Széll.



[1] Beinart, Peter. “The Failure of the American Jewish Establishment.” New York Review of Books. May 12, 2010. http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2010/jun/10/failure- american-jewish-establishment/ 2 The Institute for Jewish and Community Research. “Feds Open Anti-Semitism Investigation at UC-Santa Cruz.” March 15, 2011. http://jewishresearch.org/v2/2011/press- releases/03-15-11.html

[2] The Institute for Jewish and Community Research. “Feds Open Anti-Semitism Investigation at UC-Santa Cruz.” March 15, 2011. http://jewishresearch.org/v2/2011/press- releases/03-15-11.html

[3] Rossman-Benjamin, Tammi. Complaint Alleging Hostile Environment for Jewish Students at UC Santa Cruz. June 25, 2009. http://jewishresearch.org/v2/2011/press- releases/03-15-11a.html 4 Zeidman, Arthur. “US Department of Education Office of Civil Rights Opens Investigation in Response to Complaint Alleging Hostile Environment for Jewish Students at UC Santa Cruz.” March 7, 2011.

[4] Zeidman, Arthur. “US Department of Education Office of Civil Rights Opens Investigation in Response to Complaint Alleging Hostile Environment for Jewish Students at UC Santa Cruz.” March 7, 2011.

[5]  “Civil Rights Lawsuit Filed By UC Berkeley Jewish Student against the University of California Seeking Damages for Anti-Semitic Assault.” http://jewishresearch.org/v2/2011/press-releases/03-15-11c.html

[6] Pierce, Rebecca. “A Jewish student responds to the charge of anti-Semitism at UC Santa Cruz.” March 21, 2011. http://mondoweiss.net/2011/03/a-jewish-student- responds-to-the-charge-of-anti-semitism-at-uc-santa-cruz.html

[7] Cohen, Steven M. and Kelman, Ari Y. “Beyond Distancing: Young Adult American Jews and Their Alienation from Israel.”

[8] Wool, Danny. “Accusations of Anti-Semitism Too Common.” Santa Cruz News. com. March 16, 2011. http://news.santacruz.com/2011/03/16/accusations_of_anti- semitism_too_common.

[9] Heilman, Samuel. “Editor’s Introduction to the Distancing Hypothesis Issue.” Contemporary Jewry. October 1, 2010. http://www.springerlink.com/ content/9568l457716553v3/fulltext.html

[10] According to the Hillel website, the population of Jewish students at UC Santa Cruz is 17.46%. http://www.hillel.org/HillelApps/JLOC/Campus. aspx?AgencyId=17827

 

[11] Rosenblatt, Gary. “Alienation From Israel Hitting Liberal Seminaries.” The Jewish W eek. May 3, 2011. http://www.thejewishweek.com/editorial_opinion/gary_ rosenblatt/alienation_israel_hitting_liberal_seminaries

[12] Rosenblatt, Gary. “Day Schools Need New Israel Ed Approach.”The Jewish W eek. February 16, 2011. http://www.thejewishweek.com/editorial_opinion/gary_ rosenblatt/day_schools_need_new_israel_ed_approach


Share

Letter from the Editor – Spring 2011

In Letters from the Editor, Spring 2011 Issue on May 20, 2011 at 11:50 pm

Driving down Highway 1 this time of year, my breath always comes to halt in witness of the slow and steady retreat of winter’s chilly green, allowing the yellow mustard seed to relieve the California coastline of yet another cycle of crops. My pulse races knowing that soon the entire hillside will be covered in a warm blanket, the color of the sun. Endlessly grateful for the process of pollination that enables such majesty, I wonder how I, too, might effect my own world in such a way.

Sowing the seeds of the lessons learned over the past few months gives me the confidence to assist in the publication of a journal filled to the brim with the work of my hardworking and remarkably intelligent peers. It is a pleasure and an honor to work aside a team of creative and energetic young writers. I am endlessly proud to be part of what I know will be a generation to reckon with.

Like a garden growing from seed, the ripening of life requires diligent regulation. Working with what we’ve got, we raise ourselves from germination, tilling the soil and watering with pride the fruits of our knowledge and compassion, patiently waiting for harvest. A labor-intensive practice, no doubt. But well worth the wait.

 

L’chaim slugs,

Shani Chabansky

Published on page 4 of the Spring 2011 issue of Leviathan.

Share

Leviathan Staff – Winter 2011

In Winter 2011 Issue on May 20, 2011 at 10:43 pm

This is a list Leviathan’s Winter 2011 staff. Read the rest of this entry »

Share

Presenting Professor Paula Daccarett: A New Approach to Jewish Studies

In Campus, Winter 2011 Issue on May 16, 2011 at 7:04 am

By Shani Chabansky

One lovely day amidst the streak of pleasant, summery weather atypical to winter quarter, I had the pleasure and privilege of interviewing Professor Paula Daccarett, a visiting professor of History at UC Santa Cruz. Warm, friendly, and keenly intelligent, Professor Daccarett is a fresh face to match the new Jewish Studies major. She has come to UC Santa Cruz thanks to a grant from the Foundation for Jewish Culture/Jim Joseph Foundation.

Located in the dungeons of the Humanities building, Professor Daccarett’s starkly blank office instantly reveals her recent arrival to our university. Nevertheless, we managed to disregard the oppressive whiteness of the walls and I found myself immediately absorbed in our conversation. One of the first things I noticed was her mastery of the English language; she seemed to have an endless supply of technical terms at her beck and call, effortlessly crafting each sentence to articulate perfection. Although she was born and raised in Colombia and educated at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Brandeis University, her English is far more eloquent than many native speakers.

Read the rest of this entry »

Share

Jewish Studies: The Big Mentsch on Campus

In Campus, Winter 2011 Issue on May 16, 2011 at 5:45 am
By Shani Chabansky

Sit in Stevenson Café with a bagel and cream cheese, coffee and anything written by Jonathan Safran Foer and I guarantee that within about twenty minutes you’ll have one of the newly declared Jewish Studies majors dripping all over you with questions about identity or objectivity. Yes, theres’s a new major on campus and although it’s still small in numbers, it’s big in pride! Previously offered as a minor, Jewish Studies is now officially included among the sixty-three majors available to undergraduates at UCSC.

Co-chaired by English and Comparative Literature Professor Murray Baumgarten and Literature and History Professor Nathaniel Deutsch, the program has been under construction for over a decade. In order to create the major, Deutsch and Baumgarten assembled a proposal: a list of courses and faculty, a survey of resources on campus, statements about student interest and an intellectual justification for the major. According to Deutsch, the major is comprised of “people seeking support for things that have been organically driven,” and that the major exists thanks to a “labor of love on the part of the faculty, student and intellectual interest.” However, it is clear that generous support from foundations and donors among them, Anne Neufeld-Levin, the Helen Diller Family Endowment, the Koret Foundation, the David B. Gold Foundation, the Jewish Community Federation Endowment Fund, the Jim Joseph Foundation, and the Foundation for Jewish Culture has also played a significant role in the new major’s existence. This takes care of the proposal’s list of courses, faculty members, student interest and available resources, but what of intellectual justification?

Read the rest of this entry »

Share

Letter from the Editor – Winter 2011

In Letters from the Editor, Winter 2011 Issue on May 16, 2011 at 5:41 am

As my thoughts turn inward, both my heart and mind swell with pride and admiration for the group of individuals I have come to know over the past quarter. We are a dedicated and passionate group, willing to engage in challenging and sometimes uncomfortable dialogue. Internal tension creates pressure, but like a crooked spine in need of muscular support, our unique and sepearate ideologies lent integrity to the Jewish voice of UCSC.

In an effort to stimulate meaningful writing, Leviathan chose to free ourselves from the constraints of a specific theme. Echoing the words of last quarter, “art is news” informs the artful format of the journal and reflects our collective style. I am continually astounded by the staff’s expertise; there is no end to our ability to create.

With their potential to endure the test of time, words have an everlasting nature. Yet they maintain a transient quality, intangible in reality: words do not exist outside of themselves. This dual infusion of contradictory attributes is extremely powerful, even dangerous. A truly seasoned writer is an artist–can sculpt an idea, using words as clay and audience as kiln. This is the process that changes the world. Although I consider myself a die-hard skeptic (but never a cynic), I place all of my faith in the capacity of words to paint our colorful world with indelible ink.

L’chaim slugs,

Shani Chabansky

Published on page 4 of the Winter 2011 issue of Leviathan.

Share